Healey proposes using money from rich-people tax for dramatic increase in MBTA spending
Gov. Healey today announced a plan to spend an extra $8 billion over the next ten years on transportation projects, including a large increase in the MBTA's annual budget and nearly $1.4 billion for capital projects that would include new subway and commuter-rail cars, spending on "station accessibility and resilience, track improvements and power system resiliency" and bolstering ferry service.
But, of course, in a car-based society, the plan calls for even more money - $2.5 billion - to be spent on road projects, including bridge and culvert repairs along state roads and doing stuff to reduce "congestion hot spots." Money would also go towards the replacement of the section of the Massachusetts Turnpike where the Allston tolls used to be.
Under the governor's proposal, although the state would issue bonds for some of the work - roughly $1.2 billion for road projects - much of it would come from the "fair share" taxes now paid by above-average earners. According to the governor's office, Massachusetts collected $2.46 billion from the "fair share" tax surcharge in the last fiscal year - nearly $1.5 billion more than the state had forecast. The state's goal is to split the extra money between education and transportation.
Some $857 million of that extra income would go to public transportation, which would be followed by a plan that would "more than double support for the MBTA’s operating budget to $687 million in FY26 and immediately address the agency’s budget shortfall, putting the MBTA on a path of long-term stability," specifically:
- $400 million to address workforce and safety initiatives identified as necessary by the Federal Transit Authority
- $300 million to replenish MBTA reserves
- $25 million for a Winter Resilience Assistance Program for municipalities
- $25 million for RTA workforce recruitment and retention
- $10 million for microtransit
Also under her proposal, the state would direct an extra $100 million a year through its Chapter-90 road program to cities and towns for local road and sidewalk projects.
At the same time, the governor would spent money over the next five years for work required to bring functional east-west passenger service between Pittsfield and Boston, focused on needed track and other improvements between Pittsfield, Springfield and Palmer.
Ad:
Comments
Good news yet it feels like pitfalls abound
The 10 year plan is alluring but only works as long as the tax revenue keeps up. What's to say it won't go down over time? The current funding shortfall at mbta is exactly caused by tax revenue over time being less than expected.
Also let's hope the ballooning costs of the roads side of the budget doesn't eat away at the Mbta funding, like it did with the Big Dig budget overruns and the much delayed Green Line extension.
The governor's Transportation task force is supposed to release it's report very soon, yet in light of their outward lack of progress and now this announcement, it feels like the state is just going to pin its hopes on the millionaires tax covering everything, without finding the political will to fix the fundamentally broken road and transportation funding model.
Do it!
Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Puulleeeeze!
Do it yesterday.
Do it yesterday.
I know! I know!
I know! I know!
The Seaport is going to be a hotbed of residential & commercial construction for the next 20-25 years, so... let's plan ahead and use that tax money to build all the foundations & underpinnings & stuff for mass transportation that will eventually needed, NOW, while the Seaport is a mostly-empty post-seaport desert of streets & $9 daily parking lots while it will be easy, less disruptive, and less expensive!
/S
Bail out the MBTA,
Subsidize a Cambridge real estate developer.
Takes money from kids
How does Maura sleep at night?
https://www.ispot.tv/ad/69H4/mattress-firm-july-fourth-sale-how-do-you-s...
Huh?
You present "Bail out the MBTA" as if it's a bad thing? That public agency that moves thousands and thousands of people a day?
What about public transit in the rest of the state?
I hope this proposal covers other regional transit authorities, too. They are a lifeline that has been crumbling for decades as the T has led the way.